A leaked report from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has cast new doubt on the public findings of the group over the controversial 2017 chemical weapons attack in Douma, Syria.
The April 2018 attack in Douma killed at least 70 people and was attributed to Basher al-Assad’s Syrian government, an accusation that was stringently denied by both Syria and Russia. The two countries placed the blame squarely at the feet of Great Britain and the intelligence services, stating that the scene has been staged in a propaganda exercise.
“Not a single witness or affected patient in hospital has been found. Nor any traces of chemical ammunition have been identified. Instead, we managed to find those who participated in filming the faked video, which was eventually presented as ‘proof’ of the chemical attack”Aleksandr Shulgin, Russian representative to the OPCW, 2018
The official report into the attack by OCPW earlier this year stated that a bomb containing “molecular chlorine” was dropped from the air onto an apartment complex, a report that has now been revealed to have been flatly contradicted by OCPWs own engineers who found that the scene was indeed a fraud.
Leaked to the Working Group on Syria, a body that was established to facilitate research into the areas such as propaganda and information operations regarding the Syrian conflict, the newly uncovered report found that the canisters and the surrounding scene were inconsistent with having been dropped from the air, with them having been placed there by hand stated as the “only plausible explanation”.
“In summary, observations at the scene of the two locations, together with subsequent analysis, suggest that there is a higher probability that both cylinders were manually placed at those two locations rather than being delivered from an aircraft.”
While the mainstream media and western governments were quick to dismiss the claim as a conspiracy theory, the new document now adds weight to the claims by Syria and Russia that the Syrian government was not responsible for the attack and raises new questions about who exactly was responsible. While militant rebels have been suspected, OPCW refusing to inspect a local facility that Syria believed was being used to produce chemical weapons, it is unlikely that such an operation could have been carried out without the sanction and assistance of an outside state actor.
Speaking to Russia Today, Dr. Piers Robinson of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies questions “what kind of political pressure might have been brought to bear on the OCPW” by western governments between the initial engineering report and the final report that was issued by the chemical watchdog.
The questions raised from the leaked report are immense and also incredibly urgent. What exactly changed the final report away from the quite clear engineering report? Was the OCPW compromised by western interests from Washington, Paris or London? and equally, who was responsible for the attack and under whose instruction?
OCPW has so far not commented on the matter except to say that they are “conducting an internal investigation about the unauthorised release of the document in question”, with no comment issued as to the contents.
The leaked report can be read Here
Assessment by the engineering sub-team of the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission investigating the alleged chemical attack in Douma in April 2018 can be read Here
Briefing notes on the on the final report of the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission on the alleged chemical attack in Douma can be read Here
Red Revolution has a number of costs involved not only with the running of the site but also future plans for expansion of our reach. These include payments for domains, feature packages, advertising, photo and content libraries and more.
If you’ve liked what you’ve read on Red Revolution, please consider a kind donation or taking a look at our carefully chosen related products on many articles.
You can donate via our Support Us page via PayPal or Bitcoin. All donations are kept private and secure.
Your generosity is appreciated.
Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion with Radical Islam
By Mark Curtis
This updated edition of Secret Affairs covers the momentous events of the past year in the Middle East and at home in the UK. It reveals the unreported attempts by Britain to cultivate relations with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt after the fall of Mubarak, the military intervention on the side of Libyan rebel forces which include pro-al-Qaeda elements, and the ongoing reliance on the region’s ultimate fundamentalist state, Saudi Arabia, to safeguard its interest in the Middle East.
It illuminates path of Salman Abedi, the bomber who attacked Manchester in May 2017, and his terror network: how he fought in Libya in 2011 as part of a group of fighters which the UK allowed to leave the country to go and battle against Gadafi to topple him.
In this ground-breaking book, Mark Curtis reveals the covert history of British collusion with radical Islamic and terrorist groups. Secret Affairs shows how governments since the 1940s have connived with militant forces to control oil resources and overthrow governments. The story of how Britain has helped nurture the rise of global terrorism has never been told.
News, articles & stories from the worlds of politics & history, with a dose of retro culture.