Skip to content
Advertisements

Gavin Williamson Believed Government Responsible for Huawei Leak Before Sacking

Former Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson has revealed that he believed the government itself was responsible for the now infamous leak of classified information to The Telegraph, information that surrounds the Chinese company Huawei’s bid to run the new 5G phone network.

Speaking to The Mirror and adding yet another new twist to the unprecedented scandal, Williamson says he believed that he would be completely exonerated by any Scotland Yard investigation and was furious that Prime Minister Theresa May had refused to allow one, stating that it had been his opinion that the leak was an official leak.

“I thought the buggers, they’ve leaked the sodding thing.”

Chris Williamson, The Mirror

The Huawei Affair was running the risk of spiralling out of control for May as figures across the political spectrum called for an independent inquiry by the police. General dissatisfaction surrounding the government’s conduct has continued to grow as the Prime Minister is believed to consider the matter is now closed.

Williamson was alleged to have made a phone call to a journalist very soon after the National Security Council meeting at the centre of the affair. The timing of this phone call seems to have been enough to convince the Prime Minister of his guilt, yet questions remain.

Labour and Liberal Democrats have said if Gavin Williamson had breached the Official Secrets Act, he should be investigated and prosecuted.

May is said to have offered the MP the opportunity to resign, the then Defence Secretary refusing to do so. Williamson then informed the Prime Minister that she would have to sack him, continuing to deny the assertion he had been responsible for the leak and blaming a feud with Cabinet Secretary Sir Mark Sedwill for the situation.

Fears that Williamson may have been the fall guy for either another individual or the government itself have begun to be raised, with Williamson publicly confident of his innocence and the stated fact that he readily admitted to speaking to the Telegraph journalist who reported on the deal.

“If someone is a leaker, do they actually inform their private office that they have spoken to the journalist in question?”

Chris Williamson, The Mirror

Following the sacking of Williamson, the United States secretary of state Mike Pompeo will “warn” Theresa May against working with Huawei, stating that the company poses a risk to British national security. The possibility of Britain working with Huawei has strained relations with Washington who are engaging in a trade and technology war with the rising Chinese state, attempting to ensure that their global hegemony remains unchallenged. The possibility that darker forces are at work at the behest of the American government, the only power that profits from this leak, cannot be discounted.

Ken Macdonald, a former director of public prosecutions, has said that the leak was a breach the Official Secrets Act, arguing that any “damaging disclosure relating to security or intelligence” was a breach of the act. Only the Cabinet Office can refer the matter to the Metropolitan Police and are reluctant to do so, perhaps wishing to sweep the matter under the carpet as quickly as possible. Or perhaps it’s a case that once certain cupboards are opened, unintended skeletons might just fall out.


Support Us
Red Revolution has a number of costs involved not only with the running of the site but also future plans for expansion of our reach. These include payments for domains, feature packages, advertising, photo and content libraries and more.

If you’ve liked what you’ve read on Red Revolution, please consider a kind donation or taking a look at our carefully chosen related products on many articles.

You can donate via our Support Us page via PayPal or Bitcoin. All donations are kept private and secure.

Your generosity is appreciated.


Web Of Deceit: Britain’s Real Foreign Policy: Britain’s Real Role in the World

By Mark Curtis

In his explosive new book, Mark Curtis reveals a new picture of Britain’s role in the world since 1945 and in the ‘war against terrorism’ by offering a comprehensive critique of the Blair government’s foreign policy. Curtis argues that Britain is an ‘outlaw state’, often a violator of international law and ally of many repressive regimes. He reasons not only that Britain’s foreign policies are generally unethical but that they are also making the world more dangerous and unequal. 

The Web of Deceit describes the staggering gulf that has arisen between New Labour’s professed commitment to upholding ethical values and the reality of current policies. It outlines the new phase in global intervention, the immorality of British policy in Afghanistan, Kosovo, Iraq and Indonesia and support for repressive governments in Israel, Russia, Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Curtis also reveals Britain’s acquiescence in the Rwanda genocide and economic policies in the World Trade Organisation that are increasing poverty and inequality around the world. 

Drawing on formerly secret government files, the book also shows British complicity in the slaughter of a million people in Indonesia in 1965; the depopulation of the island of Diego Garcia; the overthrow of governments in Iran and British Guiana; repressive colonial policies in Kenya, Malaya and Oman; and much more.


Advertisements

Red Revolution View All

News, articles & stories from the worlds of politics & history, with a dose of retro culture.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.