Skip to content
Advertisements

Tony Blair Blames Immigrants for Far-Right Attacks

Michael East, Red Revolution

Tony Blair has come under severe criticism after comments he made that seemed to blame immigrants for far-right attacks, stating that immigrants into the UK had a “Duty To Integrate” to combt the far-right.

In an astonishing example of victim-blaming, the former British Prime Minister wrote in a report for his Institute for Global Change that suggested MPs were “avoiding difficult questions” and that immigrants “have a duty” to integrate into society as “far-right bigotry” is on the rise across the country. Blair went on to suggest that foreign culture and faith can “upset” the social contract.

“Particularly now, when there is increasing evidence of far-right bigotry on the rise, it is important to establish the correct social contract around the rights and duties of citizens, including those who migrate to our country.

We make it clear that there is a duty to integrate, to accept the rules, laws and norms of our society that all British people hold in common and share, while at the same time preserving the right to practise diversity, which is fully consistent with such a duty.

Without the right to, for example, practise one’s faith, diversity would have no content; but without the duty to integrate, ‘culture’ or ‘faith’ can be used as a way of upsetting that basic social contract that binds us together.”

Tony Blair

Evocative of far-right tropes including those surrounding culture war, cultural incompatibility and false suppression of free speech, Blair’s comments have been widely condemned and called out as both victim-blaming and words that are only “pandering” to the far-right, not combating it.

The report by Tony Blair’s institute also calls for mandatory citizenship lessons and the indroduction of idendity cards.

Blair’s words do absolutely nothing to aid the fight against the far-right, nor give comfort to the communities targeted by the likes of UKIP and the former EDL. In placing the blame for violence and increasingly hateful rhetoric at the door of immigrants and alleged failures of integration, Blair shirks responsibility, avoiding his own “difficult questions” surrounding increased religious violence around the world, increasing levels of poverty under austerity and the role of politicians and the media in blatant and coded hate speech.

While Tony Blair might like to victim-blame immigrants for the rise of the far-right, perhaps the origins of the problem lay far closer to his own front door.


Support Us
Red Revolution has a number of costs involved not only with the running of the site but also future plans for expansion of our reach. These include payments for domains, feature packages, advertising, photo and content libraries and more.

If you’ve liked what you’ve read on Red Revolution, please consider a kind donation or taking a look at our carefully chosen related products on many articles.

You can donate via our Support Us page via PayPal or Bitcoin. All donations are kept private and secure.

Your generosity is appreciated.


The New Faces of Fascism: Populism and the Far Right 

By Enzo Traverso

What does Fascism mean at the beginning of the twenty-first century? When we pronounce this word, our memory goes back to the years between the two world wars and envisions a dark landscape of violence, dictatorships, and genocide. These images spontaneously surface in the face of the rise of radical right, racism, xenophobia, islamophobia and terrorism, the last of which is often depicted as a form of Islamic fascism. Beyond some superficial analogies, however, all these contemporary tendencies reveal many differences from historical fascism, probably greater than their affinities. Paradoxically, the fear of terrorism nourishes the populist and racist rights, with Marine Le Pen in France or Donald Trump in the US claiming to be the most effective ramparts against ‘Jihadist fascism’. But since fascism was a product of imperialism, can we define as fascist a terrorist movement whose main target is Western domination? Disentangling these contradictory threads, Enzo Traversos historical gaze helps to decipher the enigmas of the present. He suggests the concept of post-fascisma hybrid phenomenon, neither the reproduction of old fascism nor something completely differentto define a set of heterogeneous and transitional movements, suspended between an accomplished past still haunting our memories and an unknown future.


Advertisements

Red Revolution View All

News, articles & stories from the worlds of politics & history, with a dose of retro culture.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.