Visit Red Revolution Media's online store for all your socialist, progressive and protest fashions. From t-shirts to cushions, there's something for everyone!

Advertisement

Chinese Ambassador to UK Slams ‘gross Interference’ by British Over Hong Kong Security Law

China’s envoy to the UK has accused Britain of “gross interference” in Hong Kong, saying London was misrepresenting Beijing’s new national security law. Politicians in Britain harbour an outdated colonial mentality, he added.

“Some of the politicians in the UK still have this very strong colonial mindset. They fail to recognize that Hong Kong is no longer under the British colonial rule,” Liu Xiaoming told a virtual press conference on Monday.

The Chinese diplomat spoke to the media to defend the national security law, which gives the central government more sway in the semi-autonomous city, which was returned to China by Britain in 1997.

He said the rhetoric coming from the British government, including PM Boris Johnson’s plan to grant permanent residency to holders of British National (Overseas) passports, amounted to “gross interference in China’s internal affairs” and warned that there may be consequences for it. Liu declined to describe how Beijing would react, however, to the British offer.

The diplomat also blasted Johnson for describing Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei as a “potentially hostile state vendor” when discussing foreign investments in Britain with the Evening Standard. Liu said national leaders should choose their words more carefully.

“We regard the UK as a partner. We never [say] that the UK is a ‘potentially hostile’ country. You never heard this word from any Chinese leader, from any official,” he said, adding that China seeks friendly prosperous relations with the UK.

The national security law gives Beijing more powers to deal with crimes of secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign powers aimed against China in Hong Kong. It was passed after months of mass protests and rioting in the city, which were supported by Western powers.

Britain says the law violates the “one country, two systems” arrangement, which was established when Hong Kong was transferred back under Chinese rule. Beijing has brushed off international criticisms and says the legislation is necessary to protect public order in Hong Kong.

Advertisement


SUPPORT RED REVOLUTION MEDIA


This website is not sponsored or endorsed by big business, corporations or billionaire oligarchs, we have no resources and no backing. We rely on you to keep going.


Our monthly expenses include hosting services, specialist website subscriptions and services, photo media subscriptions, newswire services, and marketing. We currently are unable to issue any payment to writers.


It is our hope that we will one day be able to be a people funded and maintained service who are uniquely positioned to give a voice to the voiceless without any influence from corporatism.


If you value our articles please consider a donation to ensure the continuation of our work. Thank you.


DONATE

 


SUBSCRIBE AND FOLLOW
Sign up to our newsletter and follow us on social media to get the latest news, updates from Red Revolution Media.
You can unsubscribe at any time

Advertisement

RT

This article is republished from RT.

RT creates news with an edge for viewers who want to Question More, coveringstories overlooked by the mainstream media and providing alternative perspectives on current affairs